What to do about Syria?

I didn’t pay much attention to Syria until January 2013 when I met a young Syrian doctor in Cairo living in the same hostel I was staying in. His parents had sent him to Cairo to escape the bloody mess in Syria and to learn German so that he could qualify for a visa to travel to Germany where his uncle lives. My friend is still in Cairo, 9 months later, studying German and watching the horrors unfold back home. He taught me a lot about the situation on the ground in Syria.

I also met a Free Syria Army (FSA) fighter in Cairo.  Yes, I did.  He didn’t speak English but my young doctor-friend translated for us.

Lora and FSA fighter in Cairo, February 2013

Lora and FSA fighter in Cairo, February 2013

My FSA friend had transported a young female from Syria to Cairo and he was on his way back to Syria.  Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had imprisoned and tortured this young woman for several months. She was an FSA ally and was released as part of a swap — the FSA released one of Assad’s men in exchange for her freedom. She struck me as a stoic and determined young woman who wanted to start her life again away from the violence in Syria.

My FSA friend told me about the atrocities occurring in Syria, about Assad’s brutality to innocent civilians, and about some of his activities as a freedom fighter.  He showed me a picture of himself standing next to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and explained that he’d met with western leaders, including the US and UN, and asked for assistance (weapons) to fight against Assad.  He said he received words of encouragement because everyone knew that Assad is evil, but no one was willing to step up to the plate and help the FSA.

By this time, I knew I must be speaking with one of the FSA leaders.

I asked him where the FSA was getting weapons if the US and the West weren’t helping.  He shrugged his broad shoulders and told me that Al Qaeda and other extremist groups offered to help, what could they do?  The West rejected their pleas for assistance.

In my mind, I divide the Syrian civil war into three groups —– the pro-Assad people, the anti-Assad FSA people, and the extremists.  There is very good reason to believe that the FSA and the extremists are working separately and apart from each other.

Map of Syria showing the three strongholds.

Map of Syria showing the three strongholds.

President Obama spoke to the American people today and said he’s made two decisions — (1) he is going to strike Syria because he’s convinced that Assad used chemical weapons against his own people, killing innocent men, women and children, and that despicable act must be punished; and (2) even though he believes he has the legal and constitutional authority to make the decision to strike Syria himself, he’s going to ask Congress for approval.

He wants a thoughtful debate, but left no doubt in the minds of the Syrians and the rest of the international community that he is prepared to strike tomorrow, the next day, the next week, the next month, with or without Congressional approval.

A thoughtful debate is indeed a breath of fresh air and a break from the past actions taken by so many of his predecessors. President Obama gets a standing ovation from me for seeking approval from Congress for use of military force in Syria. But a thoughtful debate requires something more than TV soundbites and protest signs in favor of peace.

The American public knows so little about Syria — I’m sure of it because I was completely baffled by the entire region just a few short months ago — and most of us don’t spend the time to learn much. I highly recommend this piece from the Washington Post that my son showed me today.

I plan to call Senators Udall and Heinrich and Congresswoman Lujan-Grisham and ask them to ask the Administration the following questions:

  • Over 100,000 Syrians have been killed in the past 2 1/2 years in this civil war, most of them at the hands of Assad’s military, while chemical weapons killed 1,429 Syrians on August 21. Why does the use of chemical weapons warrant intervention when so many have been killed by conventional weapons?  Is America more concerned about the weapons used against defenseless civilians rather than the loss of life? Are chemical weapons reason enough to go to war? Maybe the answer is yes!  Chemical weapons are illegal under international law, conventional weapons are not. (See this good article about the history of the use of chemical weapons, maps, who has signed the Chemical Weapons Convention.)
  • Isn’t it hypocritical for the US to express outrage over the use of chemical weapons in Syria when the US turned a blind eye to Saddam Hussein’s use of sarin gas against Iranian troops in 1988? Didn’t the US also turn a blind eye to Israel’s use of white phosphorus against Palestinian civilians in its Operation Cast Lead (Dec. 2008-Jan. 2009). International law restricts the use of white phosphorus during war. Why does the US pick and choose which atrocities to respond to?
White phosphorus used against Gaza in Operation Cast Lead

White phosphorus used against Gaza in Operation Cast Lead

  • You have picked out the targets you want to strike, Mr. President, but what is the estimated “collateral damage” as a result of any airstrike? Don’t tell the American public that your weapons are precision-guided and leave us with the idea that it is a sterile, antiseptic cleansing of some bad, bad weapons without giving us the full picture of the 100s or 1000s of lives that will be loss as a result.
  • What is the “end game”?  The US strikes Syria, Syria responds, and then what?
  • Is the Administration’s goal focused on punishing Assad (who may or may not have actually been responsible for the chemical attack) or is there a long-term goal in mind?
  • Will an airstrike by the US weaken Assad’s military?  Experts say it would not.
  • Are there alternative measures that could be employed which punish Assad without killing civilians? (Hint: Look at the region and the distribution of oil and gas.)
  • Are there links between the civil war in Syria and the Israeli occupation of Palestine?  (Hint: The answer requires a good understanding of how Syria and Israel were created.)
  • Should the US be working with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon to revamp the rules of the Security Council? Is this an opportunity to do it? (Hint: Russia vetoes actions against Syria.  The US vetoes actions against Israel.  Maybe it’s time for the veto power to be eliminated on the Security Council and both sides could come to an agreement.)
  • Have the weapons manufacturers provided counsel and recommendations to the White House regarding Syria?  If yes, what advice?
  • Has Netanyahu and/or AIPAC provided counsel and recommendations to the White House regarding Syria? If yes, what advice?
  • Will there ever be peace in the region (Syria included) until the Israeli occupation of Palestine ends?  (Hint: No)
  • What is in the long-term (10-20-30 years) best interest of the U.S. in this region?  (Hint: Stability)

I’m thinking of my Syrian doctor-friend sitting in Cairo today worried about his family and friends back home.  I’m thinking of my FSA fighter-friend who wants peace and stability in his country.  I’m wishing President Obama had met both of these intelligent young men.

Advertisements

8 Comments

Filed under Israel, Politics, United Nations, US Policy

8 responses to “What to do about Syria?

  1. Mahmoud Rabah

    As I believe “if Obama wants to strike Syria because Assad has used chemical weapons, this will be the second lie after first in Iraq 2003. this is the excuse and not the reason. Israel security is the question and the answer for any action towards Syria.
    Mr. Obame: the Human rights have been appealing for 3 years in Syria, not since August 2013

  2. iris keltz

    Well thought out piece. Lots of excellent information. I am surprised by the number of people who are in favor of attacking Syria. Those photographs of young dead bodies wrapped in what looks like sheets were very powerful. We, on the other side of the ocean are horrified and are grieving and know not what to do.

  3. Folks, Considering Obama and Kerry are running the EXACT same argument as Bush and Colin Powell did, I don’t believe them. In fact i’m having a hard time seeing a difference between Obama and Bush at all, other than the skin color.
    http://SpreadAnIdea.wordpress.com

    • Did Bush and Powell seek authorization from Congress?

      • They engaged in shameless fear-mongering and vastly exaggerated WMD accusations, taking us into war after years of not caring at all, which is a pretty good indication that they had ulterior motives for the war and any “humanitarian” concerns were completely phony.

        have you seen this?
        http://stupidhumantricksblog.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/he-lied-no/

        Same as 2003, no?

        The Congressional approval, while nice, is just a token gesture and a delay tactic. Go back and read Kerry’s words from a couple of days ago. He said a bunch of stuff he couldn’t possibly have 100% confidence in, and then told the American People with a straight face that they would be immoral to doubt him? Really? After the Iraq experience, it’s the other way around. We would be immoral to believe a single word we hear from the white house without very, very solid, proof verified by a third party (i.e., NOT the US government).

        Why do we continue to give Obama so many second chances? He is just a pretty face to market the same so-called Neo-conservative selling out of our national interest. (with just whole heaps of death and murder as a side effect).

        Oh and not to mention the fact that while killing 100,000 people is NOT a cause for war, killing 1000 people with a non-approved weapon IS? How’s that not complete and utter hypocrisy?

        Remember Colin Powell.
        Remember Colin Powell.

      • Actually, I just learned that Bush DID seek Congressional authorization to attack Iraq. And he got it. I’d forgotten about that vote.

  4. Laura Cole

    Amazing piece, thanks for sharing it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s